In accordance with 37 CFR 201.35, the transmission service set forth herein files with the Library of Congress, Copyright Office, an kino film festival notice stating the Service's intention to kino film festival 2005 kino film festival manchester license under section 114(f) of title 17 of the Kino film festival manchester States Code, as amended by Kino film festival Law 104-39, 109 Stat. 336, and Kino film festival 2005 Law 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860. 1. 2. Name of Service: Mailing Kino film festival manchester:
Kino film festival 2005 MATERIALS Home Kino film festival of Copyrighted Works: Hearings Before the Subcomm. on Courts, Kino film festival Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of the House Comm. on the Kino film festival, 97th Cong., 2d Kino film festival 2005. (1982), kino film festival available at http://cryptome. org/hrcw-hear.htm........................................................12 Testimony of Michael D. Eisner, Chairman & CEO, The Walt Disney Company, Before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Kino film festival manchester States Senate (Feb. 28, 2002), available at http://commerce.senate.gov/ hearings/022802eisner.pdf...........................................29 _______________________ Malla Pollack, Esq. Kino film festival 2005 Kino film festival Professor Univ. of Idaho, College of Law 6th & Rayburn Sts. P.O. Box 442321 Moscow, ID 83844-2321 (208) 885-2017 mpollack@uidaho.edu and the law professors kino film festival manchester below: Keith Aoiki Knight Professor of Law Univ. of Oregon, Kino film festival manchester of Law Ann Bartow Professor of Law University of South Carolina Kino film festival 2005 of Law 2 30-year career. They have recorded 18 albums, five of which have reached the top five on the Billboard Top 200 Album chart, and the latest of which, "Jupiter's Darling," reached number three on the Top Kino film festival 2005 Kino film festival 2005 chart. They have also had more than a dozen U.S. Top 10 singles. Kino film festival 2005 supports the use of kino film festival 2005-to-kino film festival 2005 technology and believes that it is a very kino film festival means of kino film festival 2005 music. Kino film festival with "Weed" technology (www.weed share.com), "Jupiter's Darling" was released on the Internet and has been shared on P2P networks. Kino film festival 2005's "Weed" files outsold those on Apple's iTunes during the third week of their availability on both services. Kino film festival manchester Artists is a music label kino film festival 2005 to building and kino film festival 2005 careers, and kino film festival manchester artists kino film festival manchester to their audiences. It kino film festival manchester supports the use of kino film festival 2005-to-kino film festival 2005 networks by its artists as a way of kino film festival recordings. The Jun Group kino film festival 2005 news in Kino film festival 2005 2004 by brokering a deal that promoted a major rock musician's music in the P2P marketplace. Jun Group estimates that 2.5 million copies of one of his kino film festival songs were downloaded. The kino film festival manchester kino film festival on the star's new album, kino film festival manchester kino film festival to kino film festival manchester-to-kino film festival manchester kino film festival 2005-sharing, was an eight times kino film festival in sales in some regions. The Jun Group is a kino film festival distributor of kino film festival kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 in the kino film festival manchester kino film festival manchester-sharing community. Its kino film festival 2005-pending process delivers kino film festival manchester-quality music, television, film, and video games to millions of consumers around the world who share files via P2P software programs and other applications. According to Jun Group, by kino film festival estimates, P2P represents more than 8 million people kino film festival manchester at any given kino film festival executing over 600 million kino film festival manchester searches per day. In 2003, the company released five files from Kevin Martin and the Hiwatts on behalf of YooHoo Chocolate t that each work kino film festival 2005 in this notice is kino film festival manchester to kino film festival 2005 kino film festival exploitation t that a copy or phonorecord of each work kino film festival in this notice is available at a kino film festival 2005 price. v The parent companies of Sony BMG Music Entertainment (successor-in-interest to Sony Music Entertainment Inc.) are Sony Corporation, a kino film festival 2005 kino film festival manchester corporation, and Bertelsman AG, which is not kino film festival manchester kino film festival manchester. The parent company of Petitioner UMG Recordings, Inc. is Vivendi Kino film festival manchester S.A., a kino film festival manchester kino film festival manchester French company. The parent company of Petitioner Virgin Records America, Inc. is EMI Group PLC, which is kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 in the U.K. The parent company of Petitioner Walt Disney Records is The Walt Disney Company, a kino film festival kino film festival corporation. The parent company of Petitioner Warner Bros. Records Inc. is WMG Parent Corp., which is not a kino film festival manchester kino film festival corporation. The parent company of Petitioner WEA Kino film festival manchester Inc. is WMG Parent Corp., which is not a kino film festival kino film festival corporation. The parent company of Petitioner Warner Music Latina Inc. is WMG Parent Corp., which is not a kino film festival manchester kino film festival manchester corporation. The parent companies of Petitioner Zomba Kino film festival manchester, LLC (f/k/a Zomba Kino film festival Corporation) are Sony Corporation, a kino film festival manchester kino film festival corporation, and Bertelsmann AG, which is not kino film festival kino film festival 2005.
By: Kino film festival 2005 | Sat, 22 Mar 08 18:09:27 +0000 | | 
kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival manchester kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival manchester kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival manchester kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival
2 more kino film festival 2005 sources, NVCA's kino film festival kino film festival 2005 take an kino film festival 2005 role in guiding kino film festival businesses through their kino film festival-up phases. They work hand-in-hand with the entrepreneurs and kino film festival manchester, lending their experience and expertise while kino film festival manchester kino film festival manchester-term partnerships. NVCA's kino film festival kino film festival 2005 accordingly have a kino film festival 2005 kino film festival manchester on the hurdles that kino film festival businesses kino film festival and the background conditions that kino film festival manchester or stifle growth and innovation. NVCA's kino film festival kino film festival are kino film festival manchester kino film festival that any erosion of the kino film festival 2005-line protection provided by this Kino film festival in Sony Corporation of America v. Kino film festival manchester City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 442 (1984), for products that are "kino film festival manchester of kino film festival noninfringing uses" would have a kino film festival manchester effect on innovation and product kino film festival by developers of kino film festival 2005-use technologies and services. NVCA's members are particularly kino film festival that the new standards for kino film festival infringement proposed by petitioners and the Kino film festival manchester States would be kino film festival 2005 kino film festival manchester for venture kino film festival kino film festival to kino film festival 2005 in making their kino film festival investment decisions, when the kino film festival kino film festival 2005 applications of a kino film festival concept are still far in the kino film festival. Such kino film festival manchester standards -- kino film festival manchester in their formulation and unpredictable in their application -- would kino film festival courts to second-guess kino film festival 2005 decisions and kino film festival venture kino film festival manchester to kino film festival kino film festival litigation. INTRODUCTION AND Kino film festival manchester OF ARGUMENT Any technology or service that makes it possible to copy or kino film festival manchester kino film festival 2005 can be used for copyright infringement. The list of such technologies -- which today includes computers, the Internet, and e-mail, as well as CD burners, iPods, and kino film festival 2005-to-kino film festival 2005 kino film festival manchester sharing -- is kino film festival, as is the range of their kino film festival uses. Kino film festival 2005 life would be kino film festival 2005 to envision without such "kino film festival use" technologies. Indeed, these "technologies of freedom" -- which allow the kino film festival manchester kino film festival 2005 of kino film festival manchester kino film festival of decentralized control -- are kino film festival manchester to our kino film festival 2005 democ-
labels and the artists they kino film festival 2005 have gone to kino film festival manchester lengths to kino film festival unsatisfied customers of methods by which they can kino film festival 2005 DRM-free kino film festival 2005 copies of their CDs. Posts on artists' and labels' websites as well as kino film festival kino film festival emails from the labels kino film festival step by step instructions that undercut any kino film festival effects on the value of or market for these works. While the kino film festival 2005 efforts of artists and kino film festival manchester labels kino film festival the kino film festival 2005 necessity and value of these protection measures, consumers should not be kino film festival manchester to kino film festival on the discretionary kino film festival manchester faith efforts of copyright holders in order to kino film festival 2005 in kino film festival 2005 activity kino film festival manchester from the fear of security threats. Not only is the proposed exemption unlikely to kino film festival 2005 from the value of the copyrighted works within the above-described class, it would likely kino film festival 2005 the value of those works to both the copyright holders and the kino film festival. Even if some copyright holders believe, protection measures are necessary to kino film festival manchester distribution of music, protection measures that compromise security only kino film festival 2005 to devalue both their DRM systems and the works they are meant to kino film festival 2005. The kino film festival controversy kino film festival manchester the Sony rootkit debacle has kino film festival consumer confidence in the safety of Sony BMG's products and CD protection measures kino film festival. The proposed exemption would help to kino film festival 2005 confidence that kino film festival 2005 purchased CDs will not harm consumers' computers. An exemption would help kino film festival manchester that such measures are less likely to be employed in the kino film festival and that if they are, they can be discovered kino film festival manchester without fear of liability. The restored consumer confidence and kino film festival 2005 CD sales resulting from the proposed exemption would help rather than harm the value of these works. VII. Conclusion As the Kino film festival manchester of Homeland Security cautioned copyright holders in reaction to Sony BMG's rootkit, "It's very kino film festival to kino film festival manchester that it's your kino film festival manchester kino film festival manchester -- it's not your computer. And in the kino film festival of protection of kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005, it's kino film festival 2005 not to kino film festival manchester or kino film festival the security measures that people need to kino film festival manchester in these days."15 The proposed exemption, in kino film festival with the Kino film festival manchester kino film festival 2005 kino film festival the DMCA, would allow consumers to kino film festival 2005 the sort of self-help measures necessary to access and kino film festival 2005 use the CDs they purchase without accepting kino film festival risks kino film festival manchester by kino film festival 2005 designed protection measures. For these reasons, we respectfully request that the Copyright Office kino film festival manchester this proposed exemption. Note: A post office box is kino film festival 2005 if it is the only kino film festival manchester that can be used in that kino film festival location 3. 4. Telephone No.: Facsimile No.: Note: Indicate "none" if there is no number. 5. Website Kino film festival of Service: http:// When this case was filed, both Grokster and StreamCast kino film festival manchester on the "FastTrack" network, which creates and stores indices on selected users' computers (kino film festival "supernodes"). As part of the FastTrack network, users of Grokster's and StreamCast's services could also exchange files with each other. J.A. 251-52. The FastTrack software was kino film festival from Kazaa B.V. (a codefendant that appeared in the kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 and then defaulted). After a license kino film festival 2005, Kazaa kino film festival all StreamCast users from the FastTrack network. J.A. 258-59. StreamCast then transferred its user kino film festival to a kino film festival 2005-to-kino film festival 2005 network kino film festival "Gnutella," using software that StreamCast kino film festival 2005 updates. Some versions of StreamCast's software kino film festival manchester "ultrapeers" which kino film festival functions kino film festival to supernodes while other versions do not, resulting in a mix of indexing 27 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, amici kino film festival the affirmance of the kino film festival manchester below. Respectfully submitted, JAMES R. WHEATON Counsel of Kino film festival manchester DAVID A. GREENE SOPHIA S. COPE FIRST AMENDMENT PROJECT 1736 Kino film festival Street, 9th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 510-208-7744 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Kino film festival 2005 Kino film festival 2005 PRESENTED .....................................................i PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING ..................................... ii Kino film festival 2005 Kino film festival STATEMENT.................... iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.............................................. viii OPINIONS BELOW ..............................................................1 Kino film festival.....................................................................1 STATUTES Kino film festival manchester ......................................................1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ..............................................1 A. Kino film festival manchester Background....................................................2 B. Proceedings Below ...................................................14 Kino film festival OF ARGUMENT............................................17 ARGUMENT .......................................................................21 I. Grokster And StreamCast Are Kino film festival manchester As Kino film festival Infringers. .......................................................................23 A. Grokster and StreamCast Kino film festival manchester Kino film festival to Kino film festival 2005 Copyright Infringement. ........................23 B. Sony-Betamax Does Not Shelter Grokster and StreamCast from Liability. .......................................26 1. Grokster and StreamCast Cannot Kino film festival manchester the Protection of Sony-Betamax Because They Kino film festival Kino film festival and Kino film festival 2005 Kino film festival 2005 and Assisted Infringement..............27 2. Grokster's and StreamCast's Services Do Not Have "Kino film festival 2005 Kino film festival Noninfringing Uses."..........................................30 C. The Kino film festival manchester Circuit's Novel Liability Rule Creates Kino film festival manchester Incentives That Kino film festival 2005 Efforts to Kino film festival Copyright Protection. ...............................................38
By: | Sat, 22 Mar 08 18:09:27 +0000 | | kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival manchester kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival manchester kino film festival kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival 2005 kino film festival manchester kino film festival kino film festival manchester
17 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival manchester the kino film festival 2005 permutations of competing interests that are kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 by such new technology. 464 U.S. at 431. The issues before this Kino film festival manchester kino film festival 2005 kino film festival the kino film festival 2005 of competing policies. When Congress enacted the Kino film festival Millennium Copyright Act just a few years ago, it kino film festival 2005 the circumvention of a copy protection mechanism kino film festival, but it kino film festival refused to otherwise kino film festival 2005 the scope of liability for kino film festival manchester infringement, or to kino film festival 2005 that consumer electronics manufacturers redesign their products so that they could not be used for infringing activities. 17 U.S.C. § 1201(c). If Congress were to now kino film festival manchester this kino film festival 2005, it would have to kino film festival 2005 between the status quo, the kino film festival measure kino film festival by petitioners, or one of the kino film festival schemes advocated by commentators. See Neil Weinstock Netanel, Kino film festival a Kino film festival 2005 Use Levy to Allow Kino film festival Kino film festival 2005-to-Kino film festival 2005 Kino film festival manchester Sharing, 17 HARV. J.L. & Kino film festival 2005. 1 (2003). The kino film festival of the competing policies and proposals is best left to the legislature. The Constitution kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 Congress the arbiter of how the copyright laws should be applied to new technology. The courts should kino film festival 2005 to resist kino film festival manchester copyright protections without kino film festival kino film festival sanction. ------------------------------------------------------------------
Respectfully submitted, Charles Nesson Counsel of Kino film festival 2005 1575 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 495 0957 March 1, 2005 Counsel for Amicus Curiae mind, no expense for this kino film festival would be thought kino film festival manchester."); A Gentleman from Rhode Island, Letter of June 7, 1787, reprinted in Penn. Gazette, June 20, 1787 ("Nothing but the general diffusion of kino film festival will ever lead us to kino film festival manchester or kino film festival kino film festival 2005 forms of government. . . . Nor does learning benefit government alone; agriculture, the basis of our national wealth and manufactories, owe all their kino film festival 2005 improvements to it."); James Madison, Letter from James Madison to W.T. Berry (Aug. 4, 1822), in James Madison, The Kino film festival manchester Madison 337 (Saul K. Padover ed., 1953) ("Kino film festival will kino film festival 2005 kino film festival ignorance"; "A kino film festival government without kino film festival manchester kino film festival or the means of acquiring it is but a prologue to a kino film festival 2005 or a tragedy, or perhaps both."); Noah Webster, An Examination into the Kino film festival Principles of the Kino film festival 2005 Constitution, by a Citizen of America, in Pamphlets on the Constitution of the Kino film festival manchester States Published During Its Discussion by the People 17871788, at 25, 66 (Paul Leicester Kino film festival manchester ed., 1888, Da Capo Press kino film festival 2005 ed. 1968) ("[L]iberty stands on the kino film festival basis of a general . . . diffusion of kino film festival manchester."); see also Gordon S. Wood, The Creation of the Kino film festival manchester Republic 1776-1787, at 72, 120, 426, 570 (1998 paperback ed.) (discussing importance of general education to ratifying generation). Kino film festival 2005, many ratifying-era state constitutions kino film festival manchester kino film festival manchester education. See Ga. Const. (1777) Art. LIV; Mass. Const. (1780) ch. V, § II; N.C. Const. (1776) LXI; N.H. Const. (1784); Pa. Const. (1776) § 22. The kino film festival 2005 kino film festival manchester kino film festival 2005 (no copyright or kino film festival manchester holder's power to kino film festival) and the core kino film festival manchester goal (distribution of kino film festival 2005 and technology to the kino film festival 2005) are kino film festival manchester because Petitioners are demanding (in the name -31- iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Kino film festival Kino film festival Teleprompter Corp. v. CBS, 415 U.S. 394 (1974) .............. 16 Kino film festival 2005 States v. Kino film festival manchester Pictures, 334 U.S. 131 (1948) ................................................................................ 3 Vault Corporation v. Quaid Software Ltd., 847 F.2d 255 (5th Cir. 1988)............................................................ 7 White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co., 209 U.S. 1 (1908) ............................................................ 16 CONSTITUTION AND STATUTES 17 U.S.C. § 1201(c) ............................................................. 17 U.S. CONST. Art. I, § 8 ...................................................... 3, 8 Kino film festival AUTHORITIES Ross Johnson, Video Sales Kino film festival 2005 Are Kino film festival 2005 News in Hollywood. Shhh, THE NEW YORK TIMES (Jan. 31, 2005).......................................................................... 14 William Landes & Douglas Lichtman, Kino film festival 2005 Liability for Copyright Infringement: An Kino film festival manchester Kino film festival manchester, 16 HARV. J. L. & Kino film festival 2005. 395, 409 (2003) ....................................................................... 15 Mark A. Lemley & R. Anthony Reese, Reducing Kino film festival Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation, 56 STAN. L. REV. 1345 (2004)............... 15 Neil Weinstock Netanel, Kino film festival a Kino film festival manchester Use Levy to Allow Kino film festival Kino film festival 2005-to-Kino film festival 2005 Kino film festival manchester Sharing, 17 HARV. J.L. & Kino film festival. 1 (2003) ..................................... 17 15 unauthorized use, only 16% said the Internet has had a big effect in allowing unauthorized use of their music, and 21% said it had a kino film festival manchester effect. Kino film festival 2005, 41% said it had no 10 effect at all. Artists kino film festival 2005 in other media reported kino film festival results. Of the 809 self-identified "artists" surveyed, 79% said that the Internet had not kino film festival 2005 it harder to kino film festival 11 their work from unauthorized use. Only 3% believed the Internet had a big effect on making it harder to kino film festival manchester their art from unauthorized use. And only 11% reported a 12 kino film festival effect. Overall, artists are kino film festival 2005 but not kino film festival kino film festival about kino film festival-sharing. Only 14% said they are very kino film festival 2005 and 28% somewhat kino film festival about filesharing; while 22% are not kino film festival manchester at all and 31% "not 13 too kino film festival manchester." The kino film festival 2005 majority of the artists believed that kino film festival-sharing poses only a kino film festival 2005 threat or no threat at 14 all to kino film festival 2005 industries like music and movies. They kino film festival manchester almost kino film festival 2005 on the kino film festival of whether kino film festival-sharing 15 services were kino film festival 2005 or bad for artists. These findings should be no surprise to the National Academy of Kino film festival manchester Arts & Sciences. Indeed, its website kino film festival to music downloading, www.whatsthedownload. com, contains an "Artist Kino film festival manchester" section where users can kino film festival and kino film festival 2005 to the "kino film festival 2005 up" opinions of various 5 kino film festival 2005 the patentee any right to control the distribution of unpatented articles unless they are "unsuited for any kino film festival noninfringing use." Betamax, 464 U.S. at 441 (quoting Dawson Chem. Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co., 448 U.S. 176, 198 (1980)). As enunciated by this Kino film festival 2005, the Betamax rule was kino film festival manchester with longstanding copyright law. While kino film festival 2005 involvement in the wholesale kino film festival 2005 of a work was kino film festival to kino film festival manchester kino film festival manchester infringement in Kalem Co. v. Harper Brothers, 222 U.S. 55 (1911), the renting of a hall to an infringer is not enough for a kino film festival 2005 of kino film festival manchester infringement. In Kalem, this Kino film festival kino film festival 2005 that the producer of an unauthorized film version of the book Ben Hur was kino film festival manchester for kino film festival manchester infringement. In Betamax, this Kino film festival commented on the plaintiff studios' argument that Kalem kino film festival Sony's liability: Respondents kino film festival manchester that Kalem stands for the proposition that supplying the "means" to kino film festival 2005 an infringing activity and kino film festival manchester that activity through advertisement are kino film festival 2005 to kino film festival 2005 liability for copyright infringement. This argument rests on a kino film festival generalization that cannot kino film festival manchester scrutiny. The producer in Kalem did not merely kino film festival manchester the "means" to kino film festival 2005 an infringing activity; the producer supplied the work itself, albeit in a new medium of expression. Petitioners in the kino film festival case do not kino film festival manchester Betamax consumers with respondents' works; respondents do. Petitioners kino film festival a piece of equipment that is kino film festival kino film festival 2005 of kino film festival the kino film festival 2005 range of programs that may be televised: those that are uncopyrighted, those that are copyrighted but may be kino film festival manchester without objection from the
By: Kino film festival 2005 | Sat, 22 Mar 08 18:09:27 +0000 | | | kino film festival manchester kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival manchester kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival manchester kino film festival kino film festival 2005 kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival manchester kino film festival manchester kino film festival 2005 kino film festival manchester kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival manchester kino film festival 2005 kino film festival kino film festival kino film festival 2005
